login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: pradeep singh rautela <rautelap@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 12:53 am

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:07:37AM +0530, pradeep singh rautela wrote:

Are you somehow not believing the files that we have in the tree that
are licensed this way?


Licensing questions would be better off asked to lawyers, not
programmers.  Would you ask a random group of lawyers on a public
mailing list medical questions and trust their responses?

good luck,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, pradeep singh rautela, (Tue Apr 29, 12:37 am)
Re: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, pradeep singh rautela, (Tue Apr 29, 4:16 am)
Re: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, Bart Van Assche, (Tue Apr 29, 1:33 am)
Re: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, Greg KH, (Tue Apr 29, 12:53 am)
Re: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, pradeep singh rautela, (Tue Apr 29, 1:10 am)
Re: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, Hans J. Koch, (Tue Apr 29, 1:26 am)
RE: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, David Schwartz, (Thu May 1, 9:59 am)
Re: [Q]Can a file be dual licensed in upstream kernel?, pradeep singh rautela, (Tue Apr 29, 1:31 am)
speck-geostationary