Re: standalone kbuild's homepage?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Denys Vlasenko
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 10:48 pm

On Tuesday 29 April 2008 07:11, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

So far busybox uses almost unmodified kernel kbuild,
mostly ignoring all the unused extra machinery (modules, System.map etc).

Works great. I mean, _really_ great. Thanks!

I found an old mail:

http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-September/024081.html


Aha! this can be it.
--
vda
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
standalone kbuild's homepage?, Denys Vlasenko, (Mon Apr 28, 8:03 pm)
Re: standalone kbuild's homepage?, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Apr 28, 10:11 pm)
Re: standalone kbuild's homepage?, Denys Vlasenko, (Mon Apr 28, 10:48 pm)