* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

quoted text
> What I'm proposing is:
>
> >   [ .... fastpath head ......     ]
> >   [ ....   5-byte CALL .......... ]  ---> NOP-ed out
> >   [ .... fastpath tail .......... ]
> >   [ ............................. ]
>
> The call site is created with an asm() statement as opposed to a gcc 
> function call; it is up to the logging function to take the state and 
> mangle it into whatever format it wants to; the debugging information 
> (e.g. DWARF) should tell it all it needs to know about how the 
> register/memory state maps onto the C state.  This mapping can either 
> be done online, with a small piece of dynamic code, or offline 
> (although offline makes it tricky to know what memory tems to gather.)

that would be rather impractical as we'd force DEBUG_INFO builds on 
anyone (it's HUGE) just to do some trivial tracing. Look at the ftrace 
plugin usage model - it wants to be widely available and easy to use.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/