>
> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:43:25PM +0400, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
> > > 2008/4/28 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>:
> > > >
> > > > /me wonders what was wrong with
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/23/131
> > > > that contains a superset of the first patch
> > > > (and got no response at all)
> > >
> > > Adrian, I am sorry for duplicating your work. The clash wasn't
> > > intentional: I did not notice your earlier patch in the high traffic
> > > of this mailing list.
> >
> > No problem, and I'm actually more interested why my patch got lost.
>
> It's simple: in this case i had two patches in my backlog, one from a
> new person and one from a frequent contributor - doing the very same
> change. I preferred the newbie's patch, to encourage Dmitri to keep
> contributing to Linux and to help him learn from the experience of
> working with various Linux maintainers.
>...