Re: [patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation for sched-devel.git

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 2:22 pm

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:



that does look more compact and more maintainable indeed. (and should 
not impact tracers in any way - we still get the very same marker) Does 
this make scheduler markers more acceptable to you? If yes i'll queue 
this up.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation for sched..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Apr 24, 11:03 am)
Re: [patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation for s..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Apr 28, 2:40 pm)
Re: [patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation for s..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Apr 28, 2:49 pm)
Re: [patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation for s..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 28, 2:22 pm)
Re: [patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation for s..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Apr 26, 4:11 pm)
Re: [patch 00/37] Linux Kernel Markers instrumentation for s..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sun May 4, 11:08 am)