Re: [PATCH 1/11] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Howells <dhowells@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, <linux-arch@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <npiggin@...>, <torvalds@...>, <peterz@...>, <sam@...>, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...>
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 10:43 am

On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 15:25 +0100, David Howells wrote:

Not necessarily; this is how we work on PARISC with a GOT as the ELF
spec defines.  The point is that the GOT is linker constructed, so we
only lay down GOT entries when the linker sees that relative
displacements fail, so they don't consume memory (or even get brought
into existence) in the ordinary case.  The flip side of this is that we
do double jump (relative to jump through got) for the long displacements
we can't reach.

James


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/11] Generic smp_call_function() #2, Jens Axboe, (Tue Apr 22, 2:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/11] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Apr 26, 2:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/11] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Apr 27, 11:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/11] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function c..., James Bottomley, (Mon Apr 28, 10:43 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/11] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function c..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Apr 26, 2:28 am)
Re: [PATCH 11/11] s390: convert to generic helpers for IPI f..., Martin Schwidefsky, (Wed Apr 23, 8:42 am)