login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
28
Re: [PATCH] kvm: add statics were possible, function definition in lapic.h
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Avi Kivity <avi@...>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] kvm: add statics were possible, function definition in lapic.h
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 7:46 am
Harvey Harrison wrote:
quoted text
> Noticed by sparse: > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:1583:6: warning: symbol 'vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:3406:5: warning: symbol 'kvm_task_switch_16' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:3429:5: warning: symbol 'kvm_task_switch_32' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1968:6: warning: symbol 'kvm_mmu_remove_one_alloc_mmu_page' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:2014:6: warning: symbol 'mmu_destroy_caches' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c:862:5: warning: symbol 'kvm_lapic_get_base' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c:94:5: warning: symbol 'pit_get_gate' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c:196:5: warning: symbol '__pit_timer_fn' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c:561:6: warning: symbol '__inject_pit_timer_intr' was not declared. Should it be static? > >
Applied, thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] kvm: add statics were possible, function definition ...
, Harvey Harrison
, (Sun Apr 27, 3:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] kvm: add statics were possible, function definit...
, Avi Kivity
, (Mon Apr 28, 7:46 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Amit K. Arora
[RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
H. Peter Anvin
Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses
Nicolas Pitre
Re: [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb()
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
913 guests
online.
Online users
doj83hkjon
Syndicate