Re: find_new_bit bloat from x86 tree...

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Miller <davem@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <mingo@...>, <torvalds@...>, <akpm@...>, <viro@...>, <heukelum@...>
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 7:41 am

On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:07:26PM -0700, David Miller wrote:

Alternatively, implement __ffs out of line? Like:

static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word)
{
	return generic___ffs(word);
}

And a generic___ffs implemented in lib/ffs.c?

If __ffs is too big to be inlined it should not be inlined. That
is a generic problem and has nothing to do with this patch, IMHO.

Greetings,
	Alexander

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
find_new_bit bloat from x86 tree..., David Miller, (Sun Apr 27, 1:07 am)
Re: find_new_bit bloat from x86 tree..., Alexander van Heukelum, (Mon Apr 28, 7:41 am)
Re: find_new_bit bloat from x86 tree..., Ingo Molnar, (Sun Apr 27, 4:41 pm)