login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...>, Paul Jackson <pj@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 5:31 am

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:17:45 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:


Actually, it's a pretty bad comment ;)


locks protect *data*, not "calls".  This matters.  Which data is actually
protected by this lock??

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Sun Apr 27, 5:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Sun Apr 27, 9:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 3:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 3:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 3:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 4:11 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 4:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 4:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 5:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 5:31 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 5:33 am)
speck-geostationary