Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Monday, April 28, 2008 - 2:31 am

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:17:45 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:


Actually, it's a pretty bad comment ;)


locks protect *data*, not "calls".  This matters.  Which data is actually
protected by this lock??

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Sun Apr 27, 2:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Sun Apr 27, 6:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 12:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 12:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 12:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 1:11 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 1:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 1:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 2:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 2:31 am)
Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Apr 28, 2:33 am)