On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:09:06AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:I've debugged enough code including filesystems far more complex than ubifs so you can happily trust my judgement. Even if not you can simply switch on your brain and notice that a runtime/boottime switch is always more convenient than a compile-time switch, and the only reason against it would be a performance penalty. --
| Matthew Garrett | [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Adrian Bunk | If you want me to quit I will quit |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [RFC PATCH 02/26] UBIFS: add I/O sub-system |
git: | |
| Andy Whitcroft | Re: VCS comparison table |
| franky | Is there any plan to support partial checkout or submoudule improvement? |
| Bill Lear | Git rescue mission |
| Sam Song | Fwd: [OT] Re: Git via a proxy server? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Edwin Eyan Moragas | poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance |
| Juan Miscaro | Not updating .libs-XXXXX, remember to clean it (huh?) |
| Diana Eichert | bcw(4) is gone |
| Lars Wirzenius | Re: Parse Error |
| Paul Monday - CS | Re: Things to write (was Re: How can I get a piece of the action?!) |
| Andreas Mueller | Re: VMS |
| Zane H. Healy | Linux BBS List #8 (Long) |
