Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select'

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 11:42 pm

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:39:54 +0300


It doesn't.


We've hit this specifically with the intel iwlwifi wireless drivers
over the past week.


Select doesn't enable downstream dependencies, it just blindly turns
it on, non-modular.  That's not what we want at all.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', David Miller, (Sun Apr 27, 5:45 pm)
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Apr 27, 9:58 pm)
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', Seewer Philippe, (Sun Apr 27, 11:32 pm)
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', Adrian Bunk, (Sun Apr 27, 11:39 pm)
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', David Miller, (Sun Apr 27, 11:40 pm)
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', David Miller, (Sun Apr 27, 11:42 pm)
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', Adrian Bunk, (Mon Apr 28, 1:13 am)
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select', David Miller, (Mon Apr 28, 1:54 am)