From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:39:54 +0300
quoted text > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 05:45:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to stir up interest in solving a problem that seems to pop
> > up frequently. :)
> >
> > The short story is:
> >
> > 1) If you say your driver "depend"s on a subsystem providing a set of
> > interfaces you need, this doesn't work properly if your driver is
> > marked built-in and that subsystem you need is modular for some
> > reason.
> >...
>
> This should work.
It doesn't.
quoted text > Can you give an example of the problem you are thinking of?
We've hit this specifically with the intel iwlwifi wireless drivers
over the past week.
quoted text > What about "select"?
>
> That's exactly what it's doing.
Select doesn't enable downstream dependencies, it just blindly turns
it on, non-modular. That's not what we want at all.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Kconfig 'depend' vs. 'select' , David Miller , (Sun Apr 27, 11:42 pm)