David Miller wrote:Yes, it should. Just be clear that *that* is a semantic change over what the code currently does; it would appear that that is what the code is *trying* to do. I believe on x86 it will still get clamped by the MTRRs, at least initially (I don't think we have flipped the default MTRR type to WB yet) but that would immediately change the behaviour on non-x86 architectures. -hpa --
| Chuck Ebbert | Wanted: simple, safe x86 stack overflow detection |
| Alan Cox | Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux |
| Yinghai Lu | [PATCH 03/42] x86: remove irq_vectors_limits |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| しらいしななこ | Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.4 |
| Jan Wielemaker | git filter-branch --subdirectory-filter, still a mistery |
| Pierre Habouzit | [PATCH] guilt(1): Obvious bashisms fixed. |
| Christopher Faylor | Re: First cut at git port to Cygwin |
| Thilo Pfennig | OpenBSD project goals |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Daniel Hazelton | Re: Wasting our Freedom |
| Luke Bakken | Re: No Blob without Puffy |
| Julius Volz | [PATCHv3 19/24] IVPS: Disable sync daemon for IPv6 connections |
| Paul Moore | [RFC PATCH v4 04/14] selinux: Fix missing calls to netlbl_skbuff_err() |
| Dave Jones | odd RTL8139 quirk. |
| Patrick McHardy | [NET_SCHED 04/15]: act_api: use nlmsg_parse |
