Jeff Garzik wrote:They don't, though. They rely on the MTRRs to get it right for them, and the MTRRs will say "uncached" in nearly all cases. Consider the case above: you would have gotten the same result *regardless*, because the MTRRs would not have made the memory cacheable. Yes, it's broken, but it was broken before as well. -hpa --
| Arjan van de Ven | [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc2 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: On Tabs and Spaces |
| Lars Hjemli | Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) |
| Eric Wong | Re: [RFC] Git config file reader in Perl (WIP) |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: GSoC 2008 - Mentors Wanted! |
| Karel Kulhavy | OpenBSD sticker considered cool by a layman |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Multi-Threaded SSH/SCP made by university of Puttsburgh |
| Douglas A. Tutty | lock(1) to lock all virtual terminals? |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Brandon S. Allbery | Re: mkdir says "no space left on device" and more problems... |
| Arthur Recktenwald | rcmd: socket: Permission denied |
| massimo rossi | Re: SLS on Compaq Deskpro 66M (486-66/DX2 EISA [ugh])? |
