On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 21:36 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:29:21PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> 
> > Oh, I didn't realize, I only did this because sparse started spewing out
> > lots of:
> > include/linux/bitops.h:166:32: warning: shift too big (65536) for type unsigned long
> > 
> > due to shift by size there, and again on line 202...I just wanted something
> > that sparse wouldn't warn about and was a little easier to understand to boot.
> 
> That's a sparse problem, really.  I wonder if we simply should introduce a
> new node type: EXPR_WARN.  So that expand would generate those from things
> like division by zero/overflow/bad shift *and* emitting an insn for those
> would generate a stored warning.

Well, even though it is a sparse problem, I think my revised version was
cleaner code anyway.

quoted text
> 
> Objections?

None here

Harvey

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/