On Sunday, 27 of April 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted text > On Wed 2008-04-23 11:12:33, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi David,
> > >
> > >actually, this CONFIG_VM86 was there even before the
> > >renaming was done.
> > >The main questions (imo) - is there any user space
> > >application who uses
> > >these flags? If they are - then even the idea of this
> > >patch was a bit bogus,
> > >and I should *not* remove all these VM86 specific flags
> > >but better define them
> > >as aliases on flags from processor-flags.h.
> > >
> >
> > Hard to know. VM86 is only used by a handful of
> > applications (DOSEMU, X.org, others?) but it's hard to
> > know what exactly they are.
>
> I believe vbetool and thus s2ram uses vm86, too.
Well, I think so too. Matthew?
Rafael
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: x86: cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK , Rafael J. Wysocki , (Sun Apr 27, 7:31 am)