Hi Ingo,

quoted text
>  the current/latest ftrace tree can be pulled from:
>
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git
>
>  the full diffs are too large to be included here, but the shortlog and
>  the diffstat is below. Not much changed in the fundamentals since the
>  last lkml posting - but many small details were refined.

I hope ftrace people discussio LTTng people more.
AFAIK nobody explain pros. and cons. ftrace against marker approach.
(of cource, LTTng people doen't explain it too)

I believe tracing feature is very important.
too few discussion is sad ;-)

Why nobody try to integrate ftrace and LTTng?
and, Why don't you separate sched-devel tree and ftrace-devel tree?
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/