On Wed 2008-04-23 11:12:33, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text > Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >
> >Hi David,
> >
> >actually, this CONFIG_VM86 was there even before the
> >renaming was done.
> >The main questions (imo) - is there any user space
> >application who uses
> >these flags? If they are - then even the idea of this
> >patch was a bit bogus,
> >and I should *not* remove all these VM86 specific flags
> >but better define them
> >as aliases on flags from processor-flags.h.
> >
>
> Hard to know. VM86 is only used by a handful of
> applications (DOSEMU, X.org, others?) but it's hard to
> know what exactly they are.
I believe vbetool and thus s2ram uses vm86, too.
Pavel
--
(english)
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: x86: cleanup - rename VM_MASK to X86_VM_MASK , Pavel Machek , (Sun Apr 27, 6:09 am)