On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:

quoted text
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 01:39:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:54:07 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >...
> > > +
> > > +	memcpy(&early_res[i], &early_res[i + 1],
> > > +	       (j - 1 - i) * sizeof(struct early_res));
> > 
> > nit: memcpy() shouldn't be used for overlapping copies.  It happens to be
> > OK (for dst<src) in the kernel implementations.  We hope.
> >...
> 
> We always use the gcc builtin for memcpy() here.

It's probably hard to write a reasonable x86 memcpy() that wouldn't happen 
to do the right thing for this case, but I do agee - we should still use 
memmove() for this, just to make it clear that it does overlapping things.

		Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/