On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:37:01PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:It was not a build error when I sent it one month ago, and that was the changelog in all such patches I sent. OK, I never tried 2). As long as this problem exists even a warning shouldn't be issued. I had this patch in my test compiles for some time. Considering that I had a new such bug to fix during this merge window "at least one unfixed module" is a bad prerequisite for making it an error since new bugs always get added. ;-) cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed --
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki | Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine! 2.6.28 |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
