On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
>
> this started out as improvements/generalizations to x86 bitops, but grew 
> generic impact (and generic optimizations) as well, so it's offered as a 
> separate tree.

Can you do the config thing differently?

quoted text
> diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig.i386 b/arch/um/Kconfig.i386
> index e09edfa..49990ea 100644
> --- a/arch/um/Kconfig.i386
> +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig.i386
> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ config ARCH_REUSE_HOST_VSYSCALL_AREA
>  	bool
>  	default y
>  
> +config GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT
> +	bool
> +	default y
> +
> +config GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT
> +	bool
> +	default y
> +

.. because instead of having each architecture do these kinds of things, 
we're trying to make the *generic* code (ie lib/Kconfig) do

	config GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT
		bool
		default n

so that you only have one single declaration (close to where the code 
actually exists), and then the architectures would just do

	select GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT
	select GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT

in their architecture settings. That's how we're now doing things like 
HAVE_IDE, HAVE_OPROFILE, etc etc.

Hmm?

		Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/