Michael Buesch wrote:
quoted text
> On Thursday 24 April 2008 15:43:50 Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> writes:
>>
>>> This untested patch is supposed to fix DMAing on some VIA boards.
>>> Currently the DMA subsystem returns an error, if the driver does
>>> tell that it supports a 64bit DMA mask. So the driver probing
>>> would fail in that case. 
>> The driver is broken then. It is supposed to retry with a small
>> mask on an error. Please fix the driver.

I must admit my comment was slightly wrong. In some cases
it can make sense to start with a small mask and retry bigger.

quoted text
> 
> I already added a workaround to the driver.
> Why do we need to workaround this in _every_ driver? 

The API was designed this way because many devices support different
hardware interfaces for different address sizes. So for example with a
32bit mask you might be able to transfer less data than with a 64bit
mask. And with the retry steps you should be able to figure out the
most efficient format for the current system.

See the discussion in Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt

cc: DaveM; I think the concept was from him originally.

-Andi
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/