Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@MIT.EDU> writes:Sounds interesting. You should consider bringing the kernel module up to kernel coding standards and submitting it for mainline. That would be the best way to get more users and testers. Have you also considered to turn it into a generic incremental binary linker too? I guess most of the infrastructure needed for it is already there. Even though gold looks very promising long link times can be still a problem in development. -Andi --
| Fred . | Please add ZFS support (from GPL sources) |
| Kristen Carlson Accardi | Re: PCIe Hotplug: NFG unless I boot with card already inserted. |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
git: | |
| Petr Baudis | Re: Cogito: cg-clone doesn't like packed tag objects |
| Andreas Ericsson | Re: [PATCH] git-merge: add option --no-ff |
| Junio C Hamano | GIT 0.99.6 |
| Wayne Scott | git-diff-tree rename detection bug |
| Unix Fan | Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cach... |
| Edd Barrett | Iwi, wireless bad behavior |
| jose thomas | Resume - Mumps Developer |
| Girish Venkatachalam | Ethernet jumbo frames? |
| Gregory McGarry | Re: Lock benchmarks |
| Perry E. Metzger | Re: HEADS UP: kqueue support merged |
| Frederick Bruckman | Re: POSIX timer_settime() dosn't set timer in some cases (lost accuracy) |
| jonathan | Re: Interrupt, interrupt threads, continuations, and kernel lwps |
