login
Header Space

 
 

Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2008 - 9:42 am

Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@MIT.EDU> writes:


Sounds interesting.  You should consider bringing the kernel module
up to kernel coding standards and submitting it for mainline. That
would be the best way to get more users and testers.

Have you also considered to turn it into a generic incremental binary
linker too? I guess most of the infrastructure needed for it is
already there. Even though gold looks very promising long link times
can be still a problem in development.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jeff Arnold, (Wed Apr 23, 2:59 pm)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Christian Hesse, (Thu Apr 24, 9:43 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jeff Arnold, (Thu Apr 24, 2:13 pm)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Christian Hesse, (Thu Apr 24, 3:16 pm)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jeff Arnold, (Mon Apr 28, 2:11 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Andi Kleen, (Thu Apr 24, 9:42 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jeff Arnold, (Mon Apr 28, 2:18 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Andi Kleen, (Mon Apr 28, 6:29 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jeff Arnold, (Tue Apr 29, 2:55 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Enrico Weigelt, (Thu May 1, 7:38 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, David Collier-Brown, (Thu May 1, 9:35 am)
Re: A system for rebootless kernel security updates, Jeff Arnold, (Tue Apr 29, 6:43 pm)
speck-geostationary