On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted text
> While reading the previous discussion, I wondered that keeping PCI would be a 
> good idea. I am personnaly using it for a custom design and would be glad 
> being able to continue using it.
> 
> If this represents too much work for you, we can probably add it later.
> 

The problem as far as I can see is that the existing header files
just don't work without a platform implementation.

I think it would be less confusing to leave them out. If you 
need PCI, it's probably easier to add new files for these
and get them working at the same time.

	Arnd <><
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/