login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
23
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Gabriel C
Subject:
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
Date: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - 1:54 pm
Justin Mattock wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just compiled latest linus git tree and getting now on an Q9300 Core2Quad , ASUS P5E-VM DO motherboard with BIOS Ver. 0606 , BIOS Rev. 8.12 >> the BIOS bug for CPU#0 message for each processor ?!? That seems somewhat buggy ?:) >> >> That BIOS version is beta and may be really buggy but I never got such a message on 2.6.24* nor on 2.6.25. >> >> >> --($:~)-- uname -a >> Linux thor 2.6.25-03530-g94bc891 #773 SMP PREEMPT Wed Apr 23 13:55:10 CEST 2008 i686 GNU/Linux >> >> >> .. >> >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808 >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) >> [ 0.000000] BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0! fixing up to 0x10. (tell your hw vendor) >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) >> [ 0.000000] BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0! fixing up to 0x10. (tell your hw vendor) >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x02] enabled) >> [ 0.000000] BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0! fixing up to 0x10. (tell your hw vendor) >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x03] enabled) >> [ 0.000000] BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0! fixing up to 0x10. (tell your hw vendor) >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x04] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) >> [ 0.000000] IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 4, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23 >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. >> [ 0.000000] Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs >> [ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET id: 0xffffffff base: 0xfed00000 >> [ 0.000000] Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information >> >> ... >> >> Please let me know if you need more infos , dmesg , config etc . >>
..
quoted text
> > Hello; I'm receiving the same thing, I received a response and it > seems that isn't a problem? "I dont know" > But if you're like me "maticulous"; things like that will bug me all day long. > besides that, are you receiving any freezes at all?, I'm unable to use > that kernel due to the freezes that it's giving me.? > regards; >
The kernel seems to work fine I don't have any kind freezes or crashes on that box. Gabriel --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
, Gabriel C
, (Wed Apr 23, 5:14 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
, Justin Mattock
, (Wed Apr 23, 11:06 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
, Gabriel C
, (Wed Apr 23, 1:54 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
, Justin Mattock
, (Wed Apr 23, 3:34 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
, Gabriel C
, (Thu Apr 24, 11:27 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0!
, Gabriel C
, (Sat May 3, 12:10 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
stephane eranian
Re: perf_counters issue with PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP
Mathieu Desnoyers
Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc2
Eric Sandeen
Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not pass unused params to xfs_flush_pages
Daniel Hazelton
Re: x86: 4kstacks default
Luben Tuikov
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
linux-netdev
:
Andi Kleen
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Herbert Xu
Re: Oops in tun: bisected to Limit amount of queued packets per device
gregkh
Patch "IPv6: keep route for tentative address" has been added to the 2.6.34-stable...
Patrick McHardy
Re: [rfc 02/13] [RFC 02/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Add callid parser
Krzysztof Oledzki
Re: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "0/0".
git
:
Johannes Schindelin
[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly
Oliver Kullmann
Re: how to move with history?
Alex Riesen
Re: git exclude patterns for directory
Andreas Ericsson
Re: why not TortoiseGit
openbsd-misc
:
Andres Salazar
About priorities in /etc/resolv.conf
ropers
Re: Real men don't attack straw men
Damien Miller
Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
Paul de Weerd
Re: COM ports
Stuart Henderson
Re: Apache Seg Fault after upgrade to 4.6 stable
linux-kvm
:
Avi Kivity
Re: KVM_EXIT_HALT and KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP
Xu, Dongxiao
RE: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: VMX: Support hosted VMM coexsitence.
Gleb Natapov
Re: qemu-kvm requires apic initialized before vcpu main loop
Gleb Natapov
Re: [PATCHv4 15/15] Pass boot device list to firmware.
carlopmart
Re: Jumbo frames with virtio net
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate