> drivers/infiniband/core/user_mad.c | 2 +- Let me say up front I have no problem with this change, which moved from <asm/semaphore.h> to <linux/semaphore.h>. So take this email as an honest question and not any form of complaint or criticism. But looking at that user_mad.c file in particular, I don't see any use of anything that looks like it would come from semaphore.h. So I'm wondering why you didn't just delete the inclusion, as you did in other places? I can merge a follow-up that does that cleanup (which builds and works fine on my usual architectures) but I want to avoid breaking avr32 allyesconfig or something like that. (Commit 2fe7e6f7 "IB/umad: Simplify and fix locking" changed the locking scheme, so maybe you looked at an older file) Thanks, Roland --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| David Chinner | Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md. |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
