Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text >> Aik... We can do s/sff/tf/ and leave bmdma alone to avoid even more
>> confusion but sff has meant tf base interface for quite some time now
>> in libata and I think it'll be better to remember that sff is the new
>> tf. Sorry about the mess.
quoted text > This renaming was discussed at the time on lkml and linux-ide, the
> patches and git pushes were CC'd, and I do not recall these complaints
> being raised at the time.
I wasn't watching libata activity even to such a small extent that I'm
doing it now, and I haven't found the discussion now.
quoted text > At this point, it's too ingrained in libata. Another rename would IMO
> just cause more needless churn.
Well, renaming -bmdma to -sff was logical. What's not so logical is that
module covering not only BMDMA activities but also taskfile access.
quoted text > Jeff
MBR, Sergei
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF , Sergei Shtylyov , (Wed Apr 23, 4:16 am)