Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +	if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END))
>> +		return -1;
> 
> ah, this explains the weird chunk in your other patch.

Why this is not in x86_32?

Please see my other mail "x86: endless page faults in mount_block_root
for Linux 2.6", with problem without this check.

-- 
Henry N.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/