Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for 2.6.26)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 - 12:15 am

Chris Wright wrote:

When we run a userspace utility on the latest kernel, it has to be compiled
with kernel-headers which have same capability set at least.
If installed userspace utility does not support newly added capabilities,
it requires users to rebuild their utilities when they update the kernel.

Typically, kernel developer faces this kind of version mismatching.
When they boots their kernel with new capabilities, it also requires to
rebuild libcap. Then, they have to revert it, when they boots with normal
kernel.

If libcap can know what capabilities are supported on the running kernel
automatically, it does not need users to rebuild libcap concurrently.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/3] add a private data field within kobj_attri ..., Valdis.Kletnieks, (Wed Feb 27, 10:49 pm)
[PATCH 2/3] exporting capability name/code pairs, KaiGai Kohei, (Tue Apr 22, 4:18 am)
[PATCH 3/3] a new example to use kobject/kobj_attribute, KaiGai Kohei, (Tue Apr 22, 4:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for ..., Alexey Dobriyan, (Tue Apr 22, 12:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for ..., Alexey Dobriyan, (Wed Apr 23, 12:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (for ..., KaiGai Kohei, (Wed Apr 23, 12:15 am)