On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:47:18PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:In which case, since it's likely I won't get a reply in the next hour (which'll delay my response by 24 hours) let me paraphrase what Andrew said. Andrew believes that it is beneficial to have other architectures, particularly x86, build other architectures drivers. Meanwhile, pHilipp Zabel believes this hardware not to be ARM specific. So, the majority concensus in the three way discussion was that it should remain visible, and the (unnecessary) include and its dependents be removed. Having now had some time (read: half an hour after dinner after getting back home) to investigate, I can point to the patch in several places: http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/armlinux/kernel/git-cur/arm:devel.mbox and find the patch with subject line: [ARM] 5010/1: htc-pasic3: remove unused defines and includes or grab 5010/1 from my patch system. If you want a patch to plaster over it, merging that would be a far better solution. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: --
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Florian Schmidt | blacklist kernel boot option |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
