Hi Jan.

quoted text
> --- linux-2.6.25/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S	2008-04-17 04:49:44.000000000 +0200
> +++ 2.6.25-bug-table-rodata/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S	2008-03-04 11:14:13.000000000 +0100
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ PHDRS {
>  	data PT_LOAD FLAGS(7);	/* RWE */
>  	user PT_LOAD FLAGS(7);	/* RWE */
>  	data.init PT_LOAD FLAGS(7);	/* RWE */
> -	note PT_NOTE FLAGS(4);	/* R__ */
> +	note PT_NOTE FLAGS(0);	/* ___ */
>  }

Is this intentional in this patch?


quoted text
>  SECTIONS
>  {
> @@ -40,16 +40,14 @@ SECTIONS
>  	_etext = .;		/* End of text section */
>    } :text = 0x9090
>  
> +  NOTES :text :note
> +
>    . = ALIGN(16);		/* Exception table */
>    __ex_table : AT(ADDR(__ex_table) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
>    	__start___ex_table = .;
>  	 *(__ex_table)
>    	__stop___ex_table = .;
> -  }
> -
> -  NOTES :text :note
> -
> -  BUG_TABLE :text
> +  } :text = 0x9090

And I do not see the 0x9090 justified.
Is this something to do with the fact that 0x90 equals NOP on x86?

Rest looks good.

	Sam
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/