On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:18 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
quoted text
> Index: linux-2.6.25/kernel/exit.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25.orig/kernel/exit.c	2008-04-20 22:34:16.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.25/kernel/exit.c	2008-04-22 11:38:05.769412824 -0500
> @@ -826,6 +826,8 @@ static void check_stack_usage(void)
>  	unsigned long *n = end_of_stack(current);
>  	unsigned long free;
>  
> +	n++;	/* skip over canary at end */
> +
>  	while (*n == 0)
>  		n++;
>  	free = (unsigned long)n - (unsigned long)end_of_stack(current);
> Index: linux-2.6.25/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.25.orig/kernel/sched.c	2008-04-20 22:34:19.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.25/kernel/sched.c	2008-04-22 11:48:06.975407495 -0500
> @@ -5190,6 +5190,8 @@ void sched_show_task(struct task_struct 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE
>  	{
>  		unsigned long *n = end_of_stack(p);
> +
> +		n++;	/* skip over canary at end */
>  		while (!*n)
>  			n++;
>  		free = (unsigned long)n - (unsigned long)end_of_stack(p);
> 

Wouldn't it be better to have exactly the same code?
How about using a statement expression macro?

#define DEBUG_STACK_FREE(process) \
({ \
	unsigned long *n = end_of_stack(process); \
	do { 	/* Skip over canary */\
		n++; \
	} while (!*n); \
	(unsigned long)n - (unsigned long)end_of_stack(process); \
})

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/