Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...>
Cc: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 - 9:49 am

On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 06:10 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote:

well.. SMP is kindof support for multiple processors, be it in one
socket, or multiple sockets.. without SMP you will only be able to use 1
of your X cores.
It is.. but with the limitations outlined above.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Justin Mattock, (Tue Apr 22, 1:13 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Jacek Luczak, (Tue Apr 22, 1:21 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Justin Mattock, (Tue Apr 22, 2:10 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Kasper Sandberg, (Tue Apr 22, 9:49 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Justin Mattock, (Tue Apr 22, 10:36 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue May 6, 6:37 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Gabriel C, (Tue May 6, 9:40 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed May 7, 5:47 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Justin Mattock, (Wed May 7, 5:56 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Justin Mattock, (Tue May 6, 11:08 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0, Justin Mattock, (Tue May 6, 6:46 pm)