Hi Stephen,

Would you please yank this patchset from linux-next?

I want to break it into two parts. The first of which
would simply be to move XPC/XPNET from arch/ia64/sn/kernel
to drivers/misc/sgi-xp where it would remain only configurable
for ia64. The second part (which I will submit later) will
make the changes necessary for it to run on SGI's UV which
is both x86_64 and ia64 architectures. I will also attempt
to ensure that this second part doesn't break the build
(sorry about that).

I'd like to resubmit the first part today. Should I submit
it to you directly?

Thanks,
Dean


On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:46:39AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted text
> Looks like Dean touched it last ...
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:06:00 -0700
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (SGI XPNET)
> 
> 
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:52:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Uh.  Who does SGI XPNET patches/code?
> 
> drivers/misc/xp/ has problems both with CONFIG_NET=y: (config-rand7)
> 
> next-20080421/drivers/misc/xp/xpc_channel.c: In function 'xpc_setup_infrastructure':
> next-20080421/drivers/misc/xp/xpc_channel.c:220: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_physical_id'
> make[4]: *** [drivers/misc/xp/xpc_channel.o] Error 1
> 
> 
> and with CONFIG_NET=n: (config-rand1)
> 
> xpnet.c:(.exit.text+0x6b0): undefined reference to `unregister_netdev'
> xpnet.c:(.exit.text+0x6bc): undefined reference to `free_netdev'
> 
> ---
> ~Randy
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/





--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/