---------- Forwarded message ---------- ... (this is the last mail I sent, I apologize if it got there already correctly and only my browser displays it corrupted on lkml.org) thermal isn't working on this board (if you mean /proc/acpi/thermal_zone ...) I also tried a vanilla kernel & it showed the same higher temperature ;( here the last mail (on lkml it was corrupted) - I don't know if you were able to read it > sure, I'll test-drive the vanilla-kernel, too > > thanks ok, tested the vanilla-kernel this morning and it shows the exact high temperatures (with CONFIG_THERMAL=y) I've got a question: when trying to disable thermal it just sits there & won't change: <*> Hardware Monitoring support ---> -*- Generic Thermal sysfs driver ---> it seemingly depends on other things: Selected by: ACPI_THERMAL && !X86_VOYAGER && ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR is it safe to disable acpi_processor and acpi or CONFIG_THERMAL in general ? or will it burn down my box ? ;) I'm asking this because it says/writes: CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL: This driver adds support for ACPI thermal zones. Most mobile and some desktop systems support ACPI thermal zones. It is HIGHLY recommended that this option be enabled, as your processor(s) may be damaged without it. thanks Mat --
| Steven Rostedt | Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB |
| Jeremy Fitzhardinge | [PATCH 02 of 36] x86: add memory clobber to save/loadsegment |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
