* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:

quoted text
> > yeah. Arjan - any new patches to try that might fix the bootup test?
> 
> I've looked at the disassembly and compared it to mine, and the gcc is 
> doing something... rather unexpected. The only thing I can think of is 
> the patch below, it should make it a ton more robust...

quoted text
> -	memset(&foo, 0, 2*sizeof(foo)); /* deliberate buffer overflow */
> +	if (current->stack_canary == *(((unsigned long *)&foo)+1))
> +		*(((unsigned long *)&foo)+1) = 0;
> +	else
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "No -ftack-protector canary found\n");

ok, i queued this up. (with the typo that Valdis noticed fixed)

but ... this bug needs to be figured out, not worked around.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/