(this is the last mail I sent, I apologize if it got there already correctly and only my browser displays it corrupted on lkml.org) thermal isn't working on this board (if you mean /proc/acpi/thermal_zone ...) I also tried a vanilla kernel & it showed the same higher temperature ;( here the last mail (on lkml it was corrupted) - I don't know if you were able to read itok, tested the vanilla-kernel this morning and it shows the exact high temperatures (with CONFIG_THERMAL=y) I've got a question: when trying to disable thermal it just sits there & won't change: <*> Hardware Monitoring support ---> -*- Generic Thermal sysfs driver ---> it seemingly depends on other things: Selected by: ACPI_THERMAL && !X86_VOYAGER && ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR is it safe to disable acpi_processor and acpi or CONFIG_THERMAL in general ? or will it burn down my box ? ;) I'm asking this because it says/writes: CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL: This driver adds support for ACPI thermal zones. Most mobile and some desktop systems support ACPI thermal zones. It is HIGHLY recommended that this option be enabled, as your processor(s) may be damaged without it. thanks Mat --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Ingo Molnar | [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
