On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:thermal isn't working on this board (if you mean /proc/acpi/thermal_zone ...) I also tried a vanilla kernel & it showed the same higher temperature ;( here the last mail (on lkml it was corrupted) - I don't know if you were able to read it ok, tested the vanilla-kernel this morning and it shows the exact high temperatures (with CONFIG_THERMAL=y) I've got a question: when trying to disable thermal it just sits there & won't change: <*> Hardware Monitoring support ---> -*- Generic Thermal sysfs driver ---> it seemingly depends on other things: Selected by: ACPI_THERMAL && !X86_VOYAGER && ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR is it safe to disable acpi_processor and acpi or CONFIG_THERMAL in general ? or will it burn down my box ? ;) I'm asking this because it says/writes: CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL: │ │ │ │ This driver adds support for ACPI thermal zones. Most mobile and │ │ some desktop systems support ACPI thermal zones. It is HIGHLY │ │ recommended that this option be enabled, as your processor(s) │ │ may be damaged without it. thanks Mat
| Steven Rostedt | Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB |
| Jeremy Fitzhardinge | [PATCH 02 of 36] x86: add memory clobber to save/loadsegment |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
