* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:50:53 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:19:30 +0200
> > Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > In theory if you e.g. convert a recursive algorithm
> > > to iterative you might save some cache foot print, but I don't
> > > think that really happens in kernel code.
> > >
> >
> > this is what Al did for the symlink recursion thing, and Jens did
> > for the block layer... so yes this conversion does happen for real.
>
> md got mostly-fixed too, via Neil's patch which sat in -mm for nearly
> two years.
had we done the de-obfuscate-4K-stacks Kconfig change earlier it might
have gotten upstream faster.
Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: x86: 4kstacks default , Ingo Molnar , (Mon Apr 21, 10:29 am)