Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Sunday, April 20, 2008 - 11:20 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael Kerrisk wrote:

OK, for now.  I think the implemented behavior is better, though.



This is probably a necessary change.  Non-synchronized changes might be
a security problem.



I guess so.



Is this something I changed?  I doubt I added this.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkgMMjsACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHT9dwCgxhprkeAg86sW11ilKtHaVYtO
Ae0An18utIREI/MnfwPO5HixxZbJz7zD
=hrvK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Apr 7, 3:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes, Michael Kerrisk, (Thu Apr 17, 11:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes, Ulrich Drepper, (Sun Apr 20, 11:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Apr 21, 8:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Apr 23, 2:37 am)