On Sunday 20 April 2008 17:40:42 Andi Kleen wrote:No, it won't. Which is what I was pointing out. You're hitting a different wall there. Never said it worked on a 32bit system. I was pointing out that there can be workloads that do reach that 50K thread-count that you seem to be calling "stupid". As I pointed out later in the message, I *HAVE* run into lowmem starvation on a 32bit x86 system. You thoughtfully removed this, perhaps because you felt it damaged your argument. The machine in question is an old P3 box with less than 1G of memory in it. (Phys+Swap on that machine is only about 1.4G) So yes, on a 32bit machine you run into problems at much, much less of a workload and a much lower thread-count than the magic 50K you are so fond of talking about. If I had been running 4K stacks on that machine I probably would have survived the mis-configuration without the reboot it took to make the machine functional again - I probably would still have reconfigured Apache and MySQL, though - the machine still would have gone largely unresponsive. DRH -- Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful. --
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10919] [regression] display dimming is slow and laggy - Acer Travelmate 661lci |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
