On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:01:46 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:it is you who keeps putting up the 50k argument. What I'm talking about is in the 10k to 20k range; and that is actual workloads by real customers. [ removed a bunch of stuff about 50k again ] it was in the commit message from me you quoted, and was rather widely discussed at the time. It's also basic math; the Linux VM gets to deal with both short and long lasting allocations; no matter how hard you try to get some degree of fragmentation; especially due to the 15:1 acceleration you get due to the lowmem issue. And before you say "you should use 64 bit on such machines"; I would love it if more people used 64 bit linux. Sadly the adoption rate of that is not very good still.... by far ;( I assume you're not asking me to give you customer confidential data from a previous job in public ;) just like you're posting the evidence that 4k stacks overflows? Google scores: 1-order allocation failed 54000 pages do_IRQ: stack overflow 4560 pages -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Arjan van de Ven | [Announce] Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 020/196] IDE: Convert from class_device to device for ide-tape |
git: | |
| Tantilov, Emil S | RE: [PATCH] net: sk_alloc() should not blindly overwrite memory |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
