On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:05:40 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> wrote:it wasn't randomly picked; it was based on 2.4 kernels (where we had 8kb, but that was roughly 2.5Kb or so for the task struct, which was on stack back then, then 4Kb for user context and 2Kb for IRQ context) yes. Adrian is waay off in the weeds on this one. Nobody but him is suggesting to remove 8Kb stacks. I think everyone else agrees that having both options is valuable; and there are better ways to find+fix stack bloat than removing this config option. -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org --
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: check for and defend against BIOS memory corruption |
| Frederik Deweerdt | [-mm patch] remove tcp header from tcp_v4_check (take #2) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching |
git: | |
