Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 - 2:58 pm

On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 14:21 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:

Yes, not by file, but by groups of compilation units
that make up a module.  I think that's more sensible anyway.

I also have patches to pr_<level> that allow for dynamic
prefixing of KBUILD_MODNAME, __FUNCTION__, and __LINE__ 
that might be a useful addition to a facility such as yours.

These patches also make the kernel smaller by removing the
direct uses of __FILE__/__FUNCTION__/__func__ from pr_<level>.

I intend to post them during the next merge window.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Jason Baron, (Tue Apr 1, 3:49 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Apr 1, 5:47 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Joe Perches, (Tue Apr 1, 10:07 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Jason Baron, (Wed Apr 2, 2:21 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Joe Perches, (Wed Apr 2, 2:58 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Jason Baron, (Fri Apr 4, 2:13 pm)
Re: [patch 1/3] dynamic printk - core infrastructure, Joe Perches, (Fri Apr 4, 2:33 pm)