Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 6)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan Stern <stern@...>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...>, pm list <linux-pm@...>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Len Brown <lenb@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...>, David Brownell <david-b@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2008 - 11:28 am

Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 17:13:11 schrieb Alan Stern:

Well, sometimes it is exactly that what we desire, eg. as a side effect
of lsusb. Should the callbacks have different semantics depending on
the reason you call them? And how should that information be transferred?

	Regards
		Oliver
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH 0/3] PM: Rework suspend and hibernation code for..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 29, 6:17 pm)
[RFC][PATCH 3/3] PM: New suspend and hibernation callbacks f..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 29, 6:23 pm)
[RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM: New suspend and hibernation callbacks f..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 29, 6:22 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM: New suspend and hibernation callbac..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 29, 10:56 pm)
[RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hib..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 29, 6:20 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 29, 10:54 pm)
[RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hiberna..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Mar 31, 5:29 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hib..., Oliver Neukum, (Wed Apr 2, 11:28 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hib..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Apr 1, 4:27 am)