Re: x86: memtest bootparam

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel.send@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, April 18, 2008 - 5:52 pm

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:17:44 GMT
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:


OK.  Did the new memtest feature get documented anywhere, btw?  I'm only
vaguely aware of its existence.


These seem pointless.  Why not just unconditionally implement memtest=? 
All the code for that should be __init anyway so we're hardly saving
anything here.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 5:52 pm)
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Pavel Machek, (Sat Apr 19, 9:33 am)
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Yinghai Lu, (Sat Apr 19, 4:54 pm)
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 21, 10:17 am)
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 21, 12:38 pm)
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 18, 6:07 pm)
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 7:32 pm)
Re: x86: memtest bootparam, Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 18, 8:03 pm)