On Friday 18 April 2008 21:18:46 Andrew Morton wrote:Thanks, fixed. An excellent question, but I thought the modern kernel etiquette was to only comment on whitespace and formatting, and call it "review"? :) Yes, kinda-sorta in that it's a ring buffer. No, in that it's bidir and consumption can be out-of-order (kind of important for I/O buffers). But the reason I'm not proposing it as a syscall is that I'm not convinced it's the One True Solution which everyone should be using. Time will tell: it's clearly not tied to tun and it's been generically useful for virtual I/O, but history has not been kind to new userspace interfaces. Snot from previous version. Removed. Yes, except I like the clarity and the BUG_ON. "#include <copyright-gpl2-plus>" for me, just to add more inclement weather to that teacup... Thanks, Rusty. --
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch |
| Thomas Gleixner | Re: Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Florian Schmidt | blacklist kernel boot option |
git: | |
| Scott Chacon | Git Community Book |
| Peter Stahlir | Git as a filesystem |
| Matthew L Foster | git and time |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: VCS comparison table |
| frantisek holop | nptd regression in 4.2 |
| J.W. Zondag | Dell PE1950 III - Perc 6i |
| Alexey Suslikov | OT: OpenBSD on Asus eeePC |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| hooanon05 | [PATCH 57/67] aufs sysfs interface |
| Michael Loftis | Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream... |
| Suparna Bhattacharya | Reviewing ext3 improvement patches (delalloc, mballoc, extents) |
| Josef 'Jeff' Sipek | [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries |
