On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Alex Dubov wrote:Nobody claimed that it is perfect. And instead of addressing the missing features and shortcomings you add a new duplicated code layer which is only useful for a restricted set of hardware. Yeah and you made this decision on your own w/o even discussing the issues at hand with the mtd developers before implementing a separate code stack. And now we should be impressed and merge it. That's not the way it works. Merging your code as is is a bad idea as it contains userspace visible changes which can not be undone easily. Interim solutions burden more problems on us than they solve. Thanks, tglx --
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Fred . | Please add ZFS support (from GPL sources) |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Alexander Gladysh | [Q] Encrypted GIT? |
| Kevin Leung | Edit log message after commit |
| Pietro Mascagni | GIT vs Other: Need argument |
| Michael Hendricks | removing content from git history |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Edwin Eyan Moragas | poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance |
| Didier Wiroth | win32-codecs, avi and amd64 question |
| Daniel Ouellet | identifying sparse files and get ride of them trick available? |
| Daniel Brewer | Re: fsync performance hit on 1.6.1 |
| Hubert Feyrer | Compressed vnd handling tested successfully |
| Elad Efrat | Integrating securelevel and kauth(9) |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | yamt-km branch |
