Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-usb@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, James Morris <jmorris@...>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...>

Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

Date: Friday, April 18, 2008 - 3:25 am

Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text> hm, there's sel_netnode_free() in the stackframe - that's from 
> security/selinux/netnode.c. Andrew, any recent changes in that area?

Keep in mind that slab might have been corrupted by someone else much 
earlier but we didn't notice due to the lack of CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG.
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 7:03 pm)

2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Mon Apr 28, 12:42 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Mon Apr 28, 2:44 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 5:43 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 11:49 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 12:58 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Tue Apr 29, 5:37 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Wed Apr 30, 7:16 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 12:59 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 5:39 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:50 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:53 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pavel Machek, (Fri Apr 18, 7:07 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pavel Machek, (Fri Apr 18, 5:42 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Alan Stern, (Fri Apr 18, 11:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:57 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 5:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 8:18 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:09 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 18, 2:40 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:24 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, James Morris, (Fri Apr 18, 6:32 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 18, 3:25 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 2:56 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 1:49 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 2:10 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:19 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:28 am)

Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looki..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 9:58 am)

Re: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not l..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 12:57 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 5:28 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Thu Apr 17, 7:55 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 9:35 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Fri Apr 18, 10:57 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 8:04 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Fri Apr 18, 10:55 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 7:40 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 8:14 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Thu Apr 17, 11:05 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:37 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 5:54 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 7:46 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 8:34 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 8:41 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 9:02 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 9:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 9:27 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 10:47 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 12:02 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Greg KH, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Kay Sievers, (Thu Apr 17, 8:48 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 12:07 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 9:12 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Dan Williams, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Tarkan Erimer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
Bart Van Assche	Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Eric Sandeen	Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
git:

linux-netdev:
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Antonio Almeida	HTB accuracy for high speed
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Online users

henrywatson

Syndicate