Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>, <linux-usb@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, James Morris <jmorris@...>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>

Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

Date: Friday, April 18, 2008 - 3:09 am

* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text> 
> I repulled all the trees an hour or two ago, installed everything on an
> 8-way x86_64 box and:
> 
> 
> stack-protector:
> 
> Testing -fstack-protector-all feature
> No -fstack-protector-stack-frame!
> -fstack-protector-all test failed

that's the stackprotector self-test: you probably have a gcc that cannot 
build a proper stackprotector kernel. No damage other than having no 
stackprotector. Arjan Cc:-ed.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 7:03 pm)

2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Mon Apr 28, 12:42 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Mon Apr 28, 2:44 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 5:43 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 11:49 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 12:58 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Tue Apr 29, 5:37 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Wed Apr 30, 7:16 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 12:59 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 5:39 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:50 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:53 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pavel Machek, (Fri Apr 18, 7:07 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pavel Machek, (Fri Apr 18, 5:42 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Alan Stern, (Fri Apr 18, 11:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:57 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 5:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 8:18 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:09 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 18, 2:40 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:24 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, James Morris, (Fri Apr 18, 6:32 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 18, 3:25 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 2:56 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 1:49 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 2:10 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:19 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:28 am)

Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looki..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 9:58 am)

Re: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not l..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 12:57 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 5:28 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Thu Apr 17, 7:55 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 9:35 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Fri Apr 18, 10:57 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 8:04 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Fri Apr 18, 10:55 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 7:40 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 8:14 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Thu Apr 17, 11:05 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:37 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 5:54 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 7:46 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 8:34 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 8:41 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 9:02 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 9:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 9:27 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 10:47 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 12:02 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Greg KH, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Kay Sievers, (Thu Apr 17, 8:48 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 12:07 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 9:12 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Dan Williams, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)


linux-kernel:
Linus Torvalds	Re: LSM conversion to static interface
Ingo Molnar	[patch 03/13] syslets: generic kernel bits
Ingo Molnar	Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
git:

linux-netdev:
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Gregory Haskins	[RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc:

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

Online users