login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
18
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Molnar
Subject:
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
Date: Friday, April 18, 2008 - 12:09 am
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text
> > I repulled all the trees an hour or two ago, installed everything on an > 8-way x86_64 box and: > > > stack-protector: > > Testing -fstack-protector-all feature > No -fstack-protector-stack-frame! > -fstack-protector-all test failed
that's the stackprotector self-test: you probably have a gcc that cannot build a proper stackprotector kernel. No damage other than having no stackprotector. Arjan Cc:-ed. Ingo --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Greg KH
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Dan Williams
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:04 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Kay Sievers
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:48 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 6:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 6:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Thu Apr 17, 8:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 9:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Apr 17, 10:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:10 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:56 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:09 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:19 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:25 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:37 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:50 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:53 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, James Morris
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:32 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 4:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 4:46 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:18 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:34 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:41 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:02 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:27 am)
Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not loo ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:58 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:47 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:55 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Alan Stern
, (Fri Apr 18, 8:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:02 am)
Re: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:54 pm)
2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Mon Apr 28, 9:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Apr 28, 9:59 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Mon Apr 28, 11:44 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:39 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:43 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 8:49 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 9:58 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:37 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Apr 30, 4:16 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Re: [PATCH 1/4] hvc_console: do not set low_latency
Russell King
Re: ARM defconfig files
Carsten Otte
Re: [patch] ext2: xip check fix
Jordan Crouse
Re: 2.6.25-mm1
James Morris
Re: [AppArmor 01/41] Pass struct vfsmount to the inode_create LSM hook
git
:
Felipe Contreras
Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins
Johannes Schindelin
[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix install-doc-quick target
Peter Oberndorfer
Subject: [PATCH] fix stg edit command
Nicolas Pitre
Re: About git and the use of SHA-1
linux-netdev
:
Ursula Braun
[patch 2/8] [PATCH] af_iucv: sync sk shutdown flag if iucv path is quiesced
Andi Kleen
Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Gary Thomas
Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?
David Miller
Re: [RFC 0/5] generic rx recycling
Chuck Lever
Re: [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses?
dragonflybsd-user
:
Andreas Hauser
Re: Transset.
Tomas
usb printer Brother HL-2030 and DragonFly
Matthew Dillon
Re: DragonFlyBSD not in compliance with RFC 1122
Nikolai Lifanov
pkgsrc issues
Jonas
Re: New to DragonFly...
dragonflybsd-submit
:
Ilya Dryomov
git: HAMMER - Add live_dedup_cache_size sysctl
Matthew Dillon
git: MBUF - Account for failed allocations so netstat -m reports properly.
Simon Schubert
git: make.conf(5): mention STATIC_LOCALES
Matthias Schmidt
cvs commit: src/sys/net bpf.c bpf.h bpfdesc.h
Simon Schubert
git: Revert "Increase the default TCP maximum segment size from 512 to 1460."
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate