login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
18
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-usb@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, James Morris <jmorris@...>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...>
Subject:
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
Date: Friday, April 18, 2008 - 2:56 am
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:40:07 +0300 "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > After 10 or fifteen minutes uptime, slab declared game over: > > > > kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:590! > > invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP > > last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:02.0/0000:05:00.1/irq > > CPU 5 > > Modules linked in: nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs lockd nfs_acl autofs4 hidp rfcomm l2cap bluetooth sunrpc ipv6 dm_mirror dm_log dm_multipath dm_mod sbs sbshc battery ac parport_pc lp parport sg floppy snd_hda_intel snd_seq_dummy ide_cd_mod cdrom snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq serio_raw snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer i2c_i801 snd button soundcore i2c_core snd_page_alloc shpchp pcspkr ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd > > Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G W 2.6.25-mm1 #4 > > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8028fea8>] [<ffffffff8028fea8>] page_get_cache+0x19/0x24 > > RSP: 0018:ffff81025f22fe88 EFLAGS: 00010046 > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffe20000028440 RCX: 0000000000000007 > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffe20000028440 RDI: 0000000000000040 > > RBP: ffff81025f22fe90 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: ffff810001080fe8 > > R10: ffff8100010b7a40 R11: ffff8100010b7a28 R12: 0000000000000282 > > R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 > > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff81025f1616c0(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b > > CR2: 0000003e5f0948f0 CR3: 000000024a01e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff81025f22a000, task ffff81025f2294a0) > > Stack: ffffffff80a11690 ffff81025f22fea0 ffffffff8028fec4 ffff81025f22fec0 > > ffffffff802909af 0000000000000000 ffff8100010b4820 ffff81025f22fed0 > > ffffffff80327789 ffff81025f22ff00 ffffffff80268932 0000000000000001 > > Call Trace: > > <IRQ> [<ffffffff8028fec4>] virt_to_cache+0x11/0x13 > > [<ffffffff802909af>] kfree+0x20/0x38 > > [<ffffffff80327789>] sel_netnode_free+0xd/0xf > > [<ffffffff80268932>] __rcu_process_callbacks+0x147/0x1b6 > > [<ffffffff802689c4>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x23/0x44 > > [<ffffffff8023cc04>] __do_softirq+0x58/0xae > > [<ffffffff8020d1cc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 > > [<ffffffff8020ed5c>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x6f > > [<ffffffff8023c72e>] irq_exit+0x36/0x38 > > [<ffffffff8021dedc>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x74/0x81 > > [<ffffffff8020cc76>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x70 > > <EOI> [<ffffffff8020a2e1>] ? mwait_idle+0x38/0x42 > > [<ffffffff8020a2a9>] ? mwait_idle+0x0/0x42 > > [<ffffffff8020b2ff>] ? cpu_idle+0xcb/0xe0 > > [<ffffffff804eaefe>] ? start_secondary+0xb2/0xb4 > > > > > > Code: 3a 48 69 c0 80 0e 00 00 48 03 04 d5 00 35 92 80 c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 53 e8 87 ff ff ff 48 89 c7 48 89 c3 e8 69 ff ff ff 85 c0 75 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 48 8b 43 30 5b c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 e8 87 ff ff ff 48 > > RIP [<ffffffff8028fea8>] page_get_cache+0x19/0x24 > > RSP <ffff81025f22fe88> > > > > security/selinux/netnode.c looks to be doing simple old kzalloc/kfree, so > > I'd be suspecting slab. But there are significant changes netnode.c in > > git-selinux. > > Andrew, you don't seem to have slab debugging enabled: > > # CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set > > And quite frankly, the oops looks unlikely to be a slab bug but rather > a plain old slab corruption cause by the callers... >
Yes, I'd agree. All has been peachy since I dropped git-selinux. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 7:03 pm)
2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Mon Apr 28, 12:42 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz...
, (Mon Apr 28, 2:44 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 5:43 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 11:49 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 12:58 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz...
, (Tue Apr 29, 5:37 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Apr 30, 7:16 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Apr 28, 12:59 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 5:39 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:50 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:53 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Alan Stern
, (Fri Apr 18, 11:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 8:18 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:09 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:40 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, James Morris
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:32 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:25 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:56 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 1:49 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:10 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:19 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:28 am)
Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looki...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:58 am)
Re: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not l...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:57 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Thu Apr 17, 7:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 9:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 10:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 8:04 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 10:55 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 7:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 8:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:37 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:46 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 8:34 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 8:41 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:02 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:27 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 10:47 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:02 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Greg KH
, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Kay Sievers
, (Thu Apr 17, 8:48 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 9:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Dan Williams
, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Justin C. Sherrill
Re: pkgsrc bulk build and tiff
Jeremy Allison
Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Roland Dreier
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
netbsd-tech-kern
:
Matt Thomas
Re: Add a MAP_ALIGNED flag for mmap(2).
Vsevolod Stakhov
Unicode support in iso9660.
Jaromir Dolecek
Re: Speeding up fork/wait path
matthew green
re: merge of freebsd eventhandler
git
:
dragonflybsd-user
:
Petr Janda
KDE and OpenSSL = Broken
sam
Re: Loader not found
Erick Perez
Re: dragonfly pdf documentation
Michel Talon
Re: Compatability with FreeBSD Ports [debian package tools]
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
2 users
and
694 guests
online.
Online users
mikejack
donkey99
Syndicate